Pages

Showing posts with label data. Show all posts
Showing posts with label data. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Scroogle is a Mistake

I've just stumbled across this article about Microsoft's Scroogle campaign, and I think it touches on what I wrote about in my last post. The gist of it is this: Microsoft started an anti-Google campaign online, accusing them of invading their users' privacy by going through their e-mail and using that data for targeted advertising.

Microsoft is obviously in the wrong here (and I'd venture to guess that they already know this), they're being hypocritical - what they accuse Google of is something they themselves actively pursue and do research in. From their website:
[...] With broad research efforts in areas like statistical learning, pattern recognition, text mining, optimization, information retrieval, recommendation, we are currently exploring practical technologies to enable large scale knowledge acquisition, to model user intention and to optimize the eco-system which involves users, rich clients and various online services. [...]
So, even if they weren't going through your email for advertising, they do actively use your personal data for profit. Of course they do - perhaps Microsoft is less reliant on this than Google, but they need the profits just as much, and they certainly can't afford to not keep up with what other companies do. There might not be anything wrong with this, but frankly it's somewhat embarrassing to see what has been a great company accuse another of screwing their users without reasonable justification.


Why out of all points in time they chose now to attack Google on this issue (Google's been doing this for years) is beyond me, but perhaps they've only now stopped doing it themselves.

But wait! They never have. Microsoft may be advertising Outlook.com with the campaign, but surely they can't just turn around and pretend Hotmail doesn't belong to them - it has nearly the same amount of users as Gmail.

To me, this entire campaign is a misplaced and counterproductive, and I hope Microsoft will eventually come to this conclusion themselves. Microsoft has recently done a great job of recovering their image as an innovative company and has released a range of really great products. I frankly don't understand why they would feel the need to start a negative campaign, instead of focusing on actually being better than the competition.

Thursday, January 19, 2012

A little Preview

So, there haven't been many posts on here the last few days, but certainly not because I've gotten lazy. Robert and I have been coding like crazy on the WikiGraph project this week, with a few sessions of 6+ hours at times.
We're coming along quite well, we've managed to implement multithreading on all of the force calculations, which has given us a speedup factor of 4 on my machine, but the implementaton allows for an arbitrary number of threads and automatically creates as many as the machine it runs on has cores (or virtual cores, with hyperthreading). Along with that comes the improved algorithm, which again about doubles performance.
This allows us to display some really large graphs - by really large, I mean up to around 6000 nodes at the moment, and that limit is mostly due to some unexpected behavior (nodes flying off to infinity), which we suspect is a result of the parameters we use in our algorithm. I expect that by the time we're releasing a beta version (which at current development speed would be sometime next week), we can display graphs of maybe 15000 nodes, which is around 3 levels deep of pagelinks if all links are loaded.
OpenGL support is also something we're implementing at the moment, since CPU rendering of these graphs actually takes up more resources and time than calculating a single iteration of forces, so outsourcing that to a graphics card will definitely help performance.
Apart from that, other changes will mostly be in UI and design, adding options for users to alter the graph and such.

Even though we aren't ready to put out a stable and usable release yet, we've already created some pretty neat visualizations:
Close up of an earlier version, 2 levels centered around Quicksort
3 levels deep (German Wikipedia), also centerd around Quicksort I believe. We're actually displaying over 5000 nodes here.
3 levels around Mathematics, over 6000 nodes. This one is not quite stable, the Mathematics article needs to be fixed otherwise it flies off. Looking into why it does that, all other nodes seem to behave as expected.